Efficacy of Group Conversation Intervention in Individuals with Severe Profiles of Aphasia

Abstract

An estimated 390,000 to 520,000 individuals with severe aphasia (IWSA) currently live in the United States. IWSA experience profound social isolation, which is associated with a wide range of negative health outcomes, including mortality. Treatments for severe aphasia frequently focus on compensatory communication approaches or a discrete communication act rather than on participation-based treatment. The purpose of this study was to determine whether IWSA demonstrated improved performance on standardized language measures, patient-reported outcome measures, and connected speech samples as a result of client-centered conversation group treatment. Results of assessments conducted at pretreatment, posttreatment, and maintenance intervals were variable across participants. All participants demonstrated improvement in at least one of the outcome measures considered. Importantly, none of these measures fully captured how IWSA were able to convey their thoughts in supported conversation. The results lend support for the use of conversation treatment for, and for further study in, this subpopulation of individuals with aphasia.

Keywords

severe aphasia - conversation treatment - discourse level treatment

Disclosures

Elizabeth Hoover is a salaried employee at Boston University and serves on the board of Aphasia Access. Gayle DeDe is a salaried employee of Temple University.

• References

• 1 Simmons-Mackie N. The State of Aphasia in North America: A White Paper. Moorestown, NJ: Aphasia Access; 2018
• 2 Kertesz A. Aphasia and Associated Disorders: Taxonomy, Localization, and Recovery. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston; 1979
• 3 Engelter ST, Gostynski M, Papa S. , et al. Epidemiology of aphasia attributable to first ischemic stroke: incidence, severity, fluency, etiology, and thrombolysis. Stroke 2006; 37 (06) 1379-1384
• 4 Pedersen PM, Vinter K, Olsen TS. Aphasia after stroke: type, severity and prognosis. The Copenhagen aphasia study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2004; 17 (01) 35-43
• 5 Ali M, Lyden P, Brady M. ; VISTA Collaboration. Aphasia and dysarthria in acute stroke: recovery and functional outcome. Int J Stroke 2015; 10 (03) 400-406
• 6 Kertesz A. Western Aphasia Battery: Revised. New York: Pearson; 2007
• 7 Hilari K, Byng S. Health-related quality of life in people with severe aphasia. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2009; 44 (02) 193-205
• 8 Parr S, Byng S, Barnes C, Mercer G. Social exclusion of people with marked communication impairment following stroke. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation Findings; 2004
• 9 Parr S. Living with severe aphasia: tracking social exclusion. Aphasiology 2007; 21 (01) 98-123
• 10 Brummett BH, Barefoot JC, Siegler IC. , et al. Characteristics of socially isolated patients with coronary artery disease who are at elevated risk for mortality. Psychosom Med 2001; 63 (02) 267-272
• 11 Heikkinen RL, Kauppinen M. Depressive symptoms in late life: a 10-year follow-up. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2004; 38 (03) 239-250
• 12 Seeman TE. Health promoting effects of friends and family on health outcomes in older adults. Am J Health Promot 2000; 14 (06) 362-370
• 13 Helm-Estabrooks N, Albert ML. Manual of Aphasia and Aphasia Therapy. Austin, TX: Pro Ed; 2004
• 14 Rao PR. Use of Amer-Ind code by persons with severe aphasia. In: Language Intervention strategies in Aphasia and Related Neurogenic Communication Disorder. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2001: 688-701
• 15 Lyon JG, Sims E. Drawing: evaluation of its use as a communicative aid with aphasic and normal adults. In: Second International Aphasia Rehabilitation Congress, Goteborg, Sweden; 1986
• 16 Morgan AL, Helm-Estabrooks N. Back to the drawing board: a treatment program for nonverbal aphasic patients. Clin Aphasiol 1987; 17: 64-72
• 17 Steele RD, Weinrich M, Wertz RT, Kleczewska MK, Carlson GS. Computer-based visual communication in aphasia. Neuropsychologia 1989; 27 (04) 409-426
• 18 Nicholas M, Elliott S. C-Speak Aphasia: A Communication System for Adults with Aphasia. Solana Beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson Co; 1998
• 19 Pictello. Mobile application software (Version 1.7). AssistiveWare BV. Available at: http://itunes.apple.com . Accessed November 14, 2019
• 20 Proloquo2Go. Mobile application software (Version 3.0.2). AssistiveWare BV. Available at: http://itunes.apple.com ; 2013. Accessed November 14, 2019
• 21 Verbally Intuary. Mobile application software. Available at: http://itunes.apple.com ; 2011. Accessed November 14, 2019
• 22 Constant Therapy LLC. Mobile application software. (Version 1.2). Available at: http://itunes.apple.com ; 2013. Accessed November 14, 2019
• 23 Albert ML, Sparks RW, Helm NA. Melodic intonation therapy for aphasia. Arch Neurol 1973; 29 (02) 130-131
• 24 Helm NA, Barresi B. Voluntary control of involuntary utterances: a treatment approach for severe aphasia. In: Clinical Aphasiology: Proceedings of the Conference. Minneapolis, MN: BRK Publishers; 1980: 308-315
• 25 Davis AG, Wilcox J. Adult Aphasia Rehabilitation: Applied Pragmatics. San Diego, CA: College Hill Press; 1985
• 26 Simmons-Mackie N, Savage MC, Worrall L. Conversation therapy for aphasia: a qualitative review of the literature. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2014; 49 (05) 511-526
• 27 DeDe G, Hoover E, Maas E. Two to tango or the more the merrier? A randomized controlled trial of the effects of group size in aphasia conversation treatment on standardized tests. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2019; 62 (05) 1437-1451
• 28 Elman RJ, Bernstein-Ellis E. The efficacy of group communication treatment in adults with chronic aphasia. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1999; 42 (02) 411-419
• 29 Elman RJ, Bernstein-Ellis E. Psychosocial aspects of group communication treatment. Preliminary findings. Semin Speech Lang 1999; 20 (01) 65-71 , quiz 71–72
• 30 Savage MC, Donovan NJ, Hoffman PR. Preliminary results from conversation therapy in two cases of aphasia. Aphasiology 2014; 28 (05) 616-636
• 31 Chapey R. , ed. Language Intervention Strategies in Adult Aphasia—5th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Williams & Wilkins; 1994
• 32 Graham MS, Avent J. A discipline-wide approach to group treatment. Top Lang Disord 2004; 24 (02) 105-117
• 33 Armstrong E, Mortensen L, Ciccone N, Godecke E. Expressing opinions and feelings in a conversational setting. Semin Speech Lang 2012; 33 (01) 16-26
• 34 Fama ME, Baron CR, Hatfield B, Turkeltaub PE. Group therapy as a social context for aphasia recovery: a pilot, observational study in an acute rehabilitation hospital. Top Stroke Rehabil 2016; 23 (04) 276-283
• 35 Lanyon L, Worrall L, Rose M. Combating social isolation for people with severe chronic aphasia through community aphasia groups: consumer views on getting it right and wrong. Aphasiology 2018; 32 (05) 493-517
• 36 Disimoni FG, Keith RL, Darley FL. Prediction of PICA overall score by short versions of the test. J Speech Hear Res 1980; 23 (03) 511-516
• 37 Holland AL, Frattali C, Fromm D. Communication Activities of Daily Living: CADL-2. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 1999
• 38 Swinburn K, Porter G, Howard D. CAT: Comprehensive Aphasia Test. Hove, UK: Psychology Press; 2004
• 39 Hula WD, Doyle PJ, Stone CA. , et al. The aphasia communication outcome measure (ACOM): dimensionality, item bank calibration, and initial validation. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2015; 58 (03) 906-919
• 40 AudioNote 2 LITE (Computer program). Luminant Software, Inc; 2018
• 41 Nicholas LE, Brookshire RH. A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia. J Speech Hear Res 1993; 36 (02) 338-350
• 42 Herbert R, Best W, Hickin J, Howard D, Osborne F. POWERS Profile of Word Errors and Retrieval in Speech: An Assessment Tool for Use with People with Communication Impairment. Guilford, Surrey: J&R Press; 2012
• 43 Boyle M. Test-retest stability of word retrieval in aphasic discourse. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2014; 57 (03) 966-978
• 44 Strong KA, Lagerwey MD, Shadden BB. More than a story: my life came back to life. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2018; 27 (1S): 464-476